Skip to content

Conversation

@bearomorphism
Copy link
Contributor

@bearomorphism bearomorphism commented Nov 11, 2025

Changes

Relate #1643

  • Refactors
  • Collect all NotAllowed error messages and raise it at the end of option validation process

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (v4-10-1@9f3ec86). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             v4-10-1    #1646   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   98.68%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       60           
  Lines              ?     2656           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     2621           
  Misses             ?       35           
  Partials           ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.68% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bearomorphism bearomorphism changed the title refactor(bump): extract option validation and new version resolution … fix(bump): extract option validation and new version resolution … Nov 11, 2025
@Lee-W Lee-W added this to the 4.10.1 milestone Nov 16, 2025
@Lee-W Lee-W changed the title fix(bump): extract option validation and new version resolution … fix(bump): extract option validation and new version resolution Nov 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Lee-W Lee-W left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly good. one minor question


if build_metadata and is_local_version:
raise NotAllowed("--local-version cannot be combined with --build-metadata")
# we create an empty PATCH increment for empty tag
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure whehter we documented this. If not, we should add it 🤔 but we could do that in the future



@pytest.mark.usefixtures("tmp_commitizen_project")
def test_bump_get_next__manual_version_is_not_allowed(mocker: MockFixture):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some conflicts between this and #1645

Maybe we wait for #1645 get merged

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one nit on that one. and than I think we're good to merge both

@Lee-W Lee-W added pr-status: ready-to-merge almost ready to merge. just keep it for a few days for others to check and removed pr-status: wait-for-review labels Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-status: ready-to-merge almost ready to merge. just keep it for a few days for others to check type: refactor

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants